The administration of Donald Trump is attempting a new diplomatic intervention on the Ukrainian front, advancing a plan for a partial ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, at a time when the prospect of a comprehensive peace agreement remains at least... uncertain.
At the epicenter of American initiatives lies a potential moratorium on strikes against energy infrastructure, as well as an agreement to protect grain shipments, with Washington attempting to establish a common negotiating baseline that could be presented to both Kyiv and Moscow.
Although Russia has made it clear that it does not favor piecemeal solutions and that it seeks an overarching agreement with a long-term horizon, calling into question the effectiveness of a limited truce, Moscow sent certain signals leaving the diplomatic door open on the condition that two fundamental terms are met: that Western sanctions against Russia are lifted and that strikes against Russian shipping are brought to an end...
This represents yet another checkmate move by Russian President Vladimir Putin against his American counterpart, Donald Trump...
Negotiations within October
The special envoys of the US President, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, are undertaking a new round of contacts with the Ukrainian delegation in Miami, today October 9 and tomorrow October 10, while the prospect of traveling once again to Moscow within October for direct talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin is already under consideration.
These developments reflect the effort by the American administration to keep the diplomatic process active, even if a comprehensive agreement to end the war does not appear immediately feasible.
New ideas
The United States intends to discuss with Ukraine the prospect of a partial ceasefire with Russia, which would envision refraining from strikes against energy infrastructure and securing grain shipments.
According to Axios, citing American and Ukrainian officials, this proposal is included among the «new ideas» that Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner will present to the Ukrainian delegation during the talks of October 9 in Miami.
Anxiety over the consequences of the war during the winter period forms a key factor behind the American initiative.
«All of them are worried about winter.
If the war does not stop, winter will be difficult.
That is why the US is trying to mediate between the two sides, aiming to formulate a joint proposal», a White House source told Axios.
Zelensky confirmed
The President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky, confirmed that Kyiv is discussing with Washington the possibility of halting strikes against energy facilities, as well as a truce concerning grain shipments.
He avoided, however, assessing the extent to which such an agreement could actually be achieved.
«I am not yet ready to say what could be realistic or more realistic», he characteristically stated.
Critical 48 hours in Miami
Negotiations between American and Ukrainian officials are scheduled to begin today, October 9, in Miami and are expected to last two days.
According to Axios, Witkoff and Kushner met on October 8 with Donald Trump, presenting him with the latest version of American proposals and receiving his feedback ahead of consultations with Kyiv.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Deputy National Security Advisor Mike Needham also took part in the meeting, according to sources of the American outlet.
The Ukrainian delegation, according to the report, includes Kyrylo Budanov, head of the Office of the Ukrainian President, Rustem Umerov, head of the Foreign Intelligence Service, Sergiy Kyslytsya, diplomatic advisor, and David Arakhamia, head of the parliamentary faction of the Servant of the People party.
Washington has also invited National Security advisors from Britain, France, and Germany to the talks, alongside representatives from NATO and the European Union.
The expanded lineup of participants indicates that American initiatives are not limited exclusively to a temporary cessation of hostilities, but fit within a broader effort to formulate a framework for the day after the war.
Security guarantees and postwar economy: The broader American plan
Beyond the prospect of a partial truce, the two sides are set to examine potential security guarantees for Ukraine, a «postwar prosperity plan», and additional elements of a future peace settlement.
A senior representative of the American administration told NewsNation that Washington seeks to shape a «new, unified proposal» covering all core aspects of the conflict.
This specific approach attempts to combine immediate de-escalation measures with long-term arrangements for the security and economic reconstruction of Ukraine.
However, the existence of a joint American-Ukrainian proposal will not automatically entail Russian acceptance, particularly as Moscow insists on a comprehensive settlement of the war.
New trip to Moscow?
Following the conclusion of negotiations in Miami, the American envoys may return to Moscow, according to Axios.
A source with knowledge of the planning of the talks stated that Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner are examining the prospect of visiting the Russian capital later in October, in order to hold a new meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
However, the visit has not yet been finalized.
The previous meeting between the American representatives and the Russian president took place on September 5.
Should the new visit be confirmed, it will represent yet another attempt by Washington to shift negotiations from the level of exploratory contacts to specific proposals that could be accepted by both sides.
The question, however, is whether Moscow will deem a limited ceasefire plan sufficient or will insist on its demand for a comprehensive agreement.
Contacts without substantive results
In September, Ukrainian newspaper The Kyiv Independent reported on growing disappointment regarding the results of efforts by the American negotiators.
Sources of the newspaper argued that Witkoff and Kushner had failed to secure «almost any result» during their visits to Moscow and Kyiv.
Despite this criticism, no intention was evident on the part of Donald Trump to replace Witkoff.
«At the same time, Trump appears unwilling to remove Witkoff from his post», noted the Ukrainian newspaper.
Retaining the same negotiating team proves that the American president continues to back the existing diplomatic arrangement, pursuing progress through a new cycle of contacts.
The Kremlin's position
While Washington examines the prospect of a partial ceasefire, Moscow insists that the conflict cannot be resolved through isolated agreements.
On October 8, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov underlined that Russia opposes piecemeal arrangements and seeks an overarching agreement ensuring long-term stability.
«We are not in favor of a piecemeal solution.
We are in favor of a comprehensive solution that will allow for the achievement of a stable settlement for many, many years, for decades», stated the Kremlin spokesperson.
This position takes on particular significance in light of the American proposals, as it highlights the diverging approach between Washington and Moscow.
While the American side attempts to create the preconditions for gradual de-escalation, the Russian side states that its priority is a comprehensive settlement with long-term force.
Deadlock in negotiations
Dmitry Peskov also agreed with the assessment of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, according to which clear prospects for an immediate peace settlement do not exist at this moment.
The Kremlin spokesperson pointed out, however, that the mission of diplomats is precisely to seek out the suitable opening that could lead the two sides into a genuine peace process.
For his part, Rubio characterized the situation in Ukraine as a dangerous impasse, warning of the risks of further escalation in hostilities.
American diplomacy pursues a sustainable solution through negotiations, while recognizing the substantial difficulties that continue to persist.
Ambiguous signals
Moscow, however, is broadcasting cautious, albeit quite ambiguous, messages.
On the one hand, the Russians reject proposals for a partial ceasefire and insist on the necessity of a comprehensive peace settlement.
On the other hand, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov, shortly after Trump formulated the proposal for an energy truce, stated that Moscow could agree under two conditions:
1. The lifting of Western sanctions.
2. The termination of attacks against Russian shipping, including the transport of energy products across all seas and not merely in the Black Sea.
As the US currently lacks effective leverage to force the Kremlin to shift its stance and halt attacks without these conditions being satisfied, the prospect of a maritime and energy truce now hinges on the answers to three questions.
For instance, the imposition of «crushing sanctions» on buyers of Russian energy products would hardly curtail Russia's exports significantly, given the deficit of supply on the global market.
Conversely, it would trigger an even greater surge in prices, even within the US.
The three questions
The three core questions are the following:
First: Is Trump prepared to lift sanctions? At least those concerning Russian energy products and, potentially, pave the way for joint energy projects between the US and Russia?
Second: Is Kyiv prepared to halt attacks against Russian shipping across all seas, including oil tankers and port infrastructure used for exporting energy products?
Third: Will Ukraine and Russia actually be able to agree on a list of installations and infrastructure that must not constitute targets of reciprocal attacks?
On all three issues, serious doubts exist.
The ball in Trump's court
If Trump decides now to lift restrictions against Russia, at a moment when Congress is already calling on him to impose «crushing sanctions», it is likely to ignite an entire campaign of accusations against him alleging that he serves Kremlin interests.
Kyiv's willingness to narrow its strike list and pledge not to attack Russian vessels in any sea is likewise doubtful, as these strikes form part of the strategy of the Ukrainian leadership to exhaust Russia.
Concurrently, doubts also surround whether Russia is willing to abandon the strategy it has chosen, namely blockading Ukrainian maritime exports, which inflicts a massive blow on entire sectors of the Ukrainian economy, as well as destroying the energy infrastructure of Ukraine ahead of winter.
On the other hand, it is obvious that Trump has a strong incentive to present even some result on the Ukrainian file before the elections.
In general terms, therefore, the ball is currently in Trump's court.
The core question is what he is prepared to offer to both Kyiv and Moscow to persuade them to reach agreements on a truce in the energy sector and at sea.
The grand trial for the Trump plan
The impending talks in Miami take on particular weight, as they will serve as a test for the ability of the United States to formulate a mutually acceptable proposal.
On one side lies the need to safeguard energy infrastructure and grain shipments ahead of winter.
On the other, the far more complex disagreements over security guarantees, terms for ending the war, and the future security architecture remain wide open.
The critical question is whether a limited truce could function as a first step toward a wider agreement, or whether diverging objectives among the involved parties will lead to a new diplomatic dead end.
The next decisive step may occur in Moscow, should the new visit by Witkoff and Kushner take place and the American proposals be placed directly before Vladimir Putin.
Until then, the partial ceasefire plan remains in the negotiating stage, without any agreement or specific commitment from the Russian side.
Washington seeks a diplomatic way out before winter, Kyiv pursues security guarantees, and Moscow demands a comprehensive agreement.
The question is not merely whether a temporary halt in strikes can be agreed upon, but whether it can form the starting point for a durable peace.
www.bankingnews.gr
Σχόλια αναγνωστών